You’ve still got mail. The advertising media landscape has changed dramatically over the years. And yet traditional media, like unaddressed mail, continues to thrive. Ken Bishop, Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Catalogue Association, explains the appeal of print vs digital media.

What percentage of advertising and marketing is constituted by unaddressed mail?
It’s a $2 billion industry. We are probably between one sixth and one seventh of the industry spend, which is fairly significant.
Have consumer habits changed in the digital age, regarding unaddressed mail?
Consumers seem to embrace more and more media. Over the last eight years catalogue volumes have increased year on year. Even with newer digital media, research suggests people are consuming media in a complementary way. The media supports each other. Retailers continue to do TVC and radio, yet you often read or hear at the end of the ad, ‘catalogue out now’. Billboards also reinforce that cross-pollination of media platforms.
So what is the catalogue’s role?
Some companies see catalogues as brand reinforcement. It’s almost subliminal branding. They may not need something immediately, but once there is a need for something, they then jump on line. That, to me, is complete complementarity with one another.
Is there a particular audience that can only be reached via unaddressed mail?
The stats are strong that 70% of people after reading a catalogue make a considered purchase. Grocery catalogues have a high readership and response rate, but it depends on demographics. It’s driven by different needs and requirements.
How has unaddressed mail changed since the digital age?
A lot of people still think catalogues are a ‘mass drop’ – just a shotgun that reaches as far and as wide as possible. It’s quite the contrary. Even though the volumes are significant the targeted understanding and the knowledge the distribution companies and retailers have of particular postcodes to communicate with the right customers, at the right time, to the right product, is pretty sophisticated. It cuts down waste and also the retailer is only spending what they need to.
Has the way catalogues are designed and presented changed?
Certainly the design and presentation has changed. We’ve all got shorter attention spans. Retailers can get their brand, products and whatever message they’re trying to get across more quickly. The design, placement and presentation
is a new world. Certain groups consume that information faster.
Will it ever go completely digital?
Our research suggests people still like to engage in that tactile experience of paper. There’s still something about the human psyche that enjoys that ability to touch and feel.
Has there been an increase in packaging to achieve ‘cut through’?
It’s still a relatively simple medium in terms of packaging. It’s still put through your letterbox. It’s all down to design and targeting. The old days of saying ‘let’s put everything into it and hope they read it and buy it’ have gone. Research from 2009 told us that a catalogue stays in the home on average between 2–5 days, and quite often is read by 2–3 people. That’s a decent shelf life for something not considered anything more than just underaddressed mail. It obviously has some repeat attendance. That’s one of its strong merits and obviously the brand and product owners believe that too.
What sustainable practices does the catalogue association require or encourage?
All the paper in the Australian catalogue market comes from sustainable plantation timbers. Catalogues are 100 % recyclable and nearly 70% of catalogues are recycled via kerbside collection. It adds value to the recycling stream.
How do the lifecycle assessments of digital marketing compare with print?
I get very disturbed when I hear people saying I can look at catalogues on line for half the night, and have no awareness that that has a carbon footprint as well. There’s a great big power station in Yallourn burning coal so we can all stare at our computer. And then when we throw [the computer] out every two or three years it doesn’t end up as ‘pretty’ in landfill as paper does.
![PhotoforAGE10[4][2]_02](http://www.australianpaper.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/PhotoforAGE1042_02-214x300.jpg)












