
“[Australia] should be better regarded as a dynamic and creative nation, a good global citizen and a strong business partner,” Trade Minister Simon Crean declared during his May announcement of the new $20 million Australia Unlimited brand.
Wanting Australia to be viewed for its brains and not just its beauty as a quickie holiday destination, Crean added: “We want greater international recognition of our many achievements. These achievements include 11 Nobel prize winners, WiFi technology, the bionic ear and a vaccine for cervical cancer.”
The new brand created by M&C Saatchi cost $4 million and will have another $16 million spent promoting it. The first stages of which were spent launching at the Shanghai Expo and the World Cup in South Africa.
M&C Saatchi has the pedigree. They created the popular and recognisable 100% Pure New Zealand campaign. Australia Unlimited uses arrows to suggest both limitless opportunity and export. Another reading is one of brackets suggesting multicultural inclusiveness.
It would be premature to judge its effectiveness. And as Australian Graphic Design Association National President Brenton Murray says, “That’s the beauty of design. If you rang 100 people you’d find 30 that loved it, 30 that hated it and the rest were not too fussed. You’ve got to imagine it sitting across all industries and not look silly on a new drug or technology we’ve created. It would sit well on anything.”
One critic of the logo, rather than the intent, is Australian Made Australian Grown’s CEO Ian Harrison. He believes it’s too obscure: “For better or worse [Australia’s] known for the kangaroo. Why throw it away?”
More saliently Harrison argues that the Australia Unlimited logo “presents yet another image for international people to recognise and connect with Australia’’. And he doesn’t mean it in a good way. It confuses the public.
A better use of the ‘unlimited’ money would have been spent reinforcing the Australian Made campaign, he believes. Recognised as a superbrand, the Australian Made logo created by Ken Cato in 1986 has supported a campaign to buy Australian made and grown products. The logo appears on some 10,000 products and is exported to 30 countries.
“The AMAG logo, with its 24 year market capital, would have provided that connection with Australia and as well would have created the important link between Australia Unlimited and the thousands of products and produce Australian exporters are seeking to sell around the world.”
In 2007/08 the Industry Capability Network recorded $328.3 million in orders to Australian industry. For every million dollars spent it contributes 10 full time jobs, raises over quarter of a million in taxes that go into improving our lifestyle.
To staunch the flow of manufacturing to foreign shores and encourage business campaigns like Australian Made and Australia Unlimited help, but can only do so much. Actively declaring that our products are cleaner, better made, and encourage less polluting, requires money that the Australian Made campaign doesn’t have. And while the Australia Unlimited currently has a reasonable budget, as a government department it can’t push the Australian made line harder for fear of appearing protectionist.
“[Australia is] lily white and I think we bend over too far on our blind compliance [to the World Trade Organisation],” says Harrison. “In that context the government is reluctant to come out and support a ‘buy Australian’ campaign. Or to argue about things like sustainability and food miles and environmental considerations or something that will last.”
Meanwhile State governments like Queensland and Victoria recognise the importance of design in adding value to manufacturing and the economy. Victoria, the only state with longitudinal figures, reports in Five Years On that design contributes annually some $300 million to the Victorian economy. Which begs the question, if design is so important to our economies, why isn’t it handled on a federal level? The 2007 Cutler Report of the National Innovation System mentions design
once, says Design Victoria Director Michele Azzopardi.
Where Australian Made defines its products as made, not just designed, in Australia, Design Victoria sees no problem with supporting both. It endorses exporting design alongside a homegrown manufacturing industry.
“Designers in Australia could be exporting their services,” says Azzopardi. “The creativity and the knowledge and the intellectual property belongs in Australia, but someone else manufactures it, we don’t see that as an issue. We see that as part of the future.”